What is hedge accounting and why is it optional?
Hedge accounting is an optional policy that lets a company recognise the gain or loss on a hedging instrument in the same period, and the same place in the financial statements, as the offsetting loss or gain on the item it is hedging. It is optional because IFRS 9.6.1.1 frames it as a permitted policy rather than a requirement: even where the hedge is not designated, a derivative is still measured at fair value through profit or loss under IFRS 9.5.2.1, so hedge accounting changes only the timing and location of recognition, not whether the instrument sits on balance sheet.
Without designation, an economically sound hedge can still produce reported volatility. The derivative is remeasured to fair value through profit or loss each period, while a forecast transaction or a foreign net investment is not yet recognised, so the offset that exists in cash terms never meets in the same reporting line. IFRS 9.6.1.1-6.1.3 lets a company correct that mismatch by designating a qualifying relationship, and it permits hedging of financial and non-financial items (for example forecast jet-fuel purchases) provided the risk is separately identifiable and reliably measurable per IFRS 9.6.3.1 and 6.3.7.
The trade-off is administrative rigour. To obtain the relief a company must satisfy the qualifying criteria in IFRS 9.6.4.1, prepare formal documentation at inception, and assess effectiveness on an ongoing prospective basis. Auditors treat the policy as an assertion to be evidenced, not a label to be accepted, which is why documentation completeness and effectiveness judgement drive most of the audit effort discussed below.
What are the three types of hedge?
IFRS 9.6.5.2 permits three hedge relationships: a fair value hedge, a cash flow hedge, and a hedge of a net investment in a foreign operation. The category is dictated by the exposure being hedged, and it drives whether the effective portion of the instrument's fair value change is recognised in profit or loss or in other comprehensive income (OCI). The table summarises the mechanics under IFRS 9.6.5.8, 6.5.11 and 6.5.13.
| Hedge type | Exposure (IFRS 9.6.5.2) | Effective portion | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fair value | Change in fair value of a recognised asset, liability or firm commitment | Profit or loss, alongside the hedged item's remeasurement for the hedged risk | 6.5.8 |
| Cash flow | Variability in future cash flows (forecast transaction, variable-rate debt, forecast FX purchase) | OCI (cash flow hedge reserve); reclassified or basis-adjusted later | 6.5.11 |
| Net investment | FX exposure on the net assets of a foreign operation | OCI (foreign currency translation reserve); recycled on disposal | 6.5.13 |
Fair value hedge
A fair value hedge addresses the risk that the fair value of a recognised asset, liability or unrecognised firm commitment changes with a market variable such as interest rates. Under IFRS 9.6.5.8 the hedging instrument is remeasured to fair value through profit or loss, and — crucially — the carrying amount of the hedged item is also adjusted for the change attributable to the hedged risk, with that adjustment posted to profit or loss. A fixed-rate bond hedged with a pay-fixed/receive-floating swap is the classic case: if a perfect offset holds, the two profit-or-loss entries cancel and only ineffectiveness remains.
Cash flow hedge
A cash flow hedge addresses variability in future cash flows attributable to a particular risk — a forecast FX purchase, a variable-rate borrowing, or a highly probable commodity purchase. Under IFRS 9.6.5.11 the effective portion of the instrument's fair value change is deferred in OCI within a separate cash flow hedge reserve, and released to profit or loss when the hedged cash flows affect profit or loss. Where the hedged item is a forecast purchase of a non-financial asset, IFRS 9.6.5.11(d)(i) requires the accumulated reserve to be removed from equity and included directly in the initial cost of that asset — a "basis adjustment" rather than a reclassification. The forecast transaction must remain highly probable for the hedge to continue.
Net investment hedge
A net investment hedge protects the parent's exposure to FX movements on the net assets of a foreign operation, and is accounted for like a cash flow hedge under IFRS 9.6.5.13: the effective portion goes to the foreign currency translation reserve in OCI and is reclassified to profit or loss only on disposal of the operation, consistent with IAS 21.48. The hedging instrument is often foreign-currency borrowing or an FX forward. IFRIC 16 constrains which entity within the group can hold the instrument and how much exposure can be designated, so the mechanics are more constrained than the other two types.
What must a hedge meet to qualify?
IFRS 9.6.4.1 sets three cumulative gates: the relationship must involve only eligible instruments and items; it must be formally documented at inception; and it must meet the hedge effectiveness requirements. The effectiveness requirements in IFRS 9.6.4.1(c) are the headline change from IAS 39 — there is an economic relationship between hedged item and hedging instrument, credit risk does not dominate the value changes, and the hedge ratio equals the ratio of the quantities actually used to hedge. The historic 80-125% retrospective bright line is gone.
The economic-relationship condition, expanded in IFRS 9.B6.4.4-B6.4.6, asks whether the values of the hedged item and instrument move in opposite directions because of the same underlying risk — not whether they correlate statistically. The credit-risk condition (IFRS 9.B6.4.7-B6.4.8) fails where changes in the counterparty's or the entity's own credit standing swamp the offset the hedge is meant to deliver, which is why heavily out-of-the-money uncollateralised derivatives are scrutinised. The hedge-ratio condition (IFRS 9.B6.4.9) forbids deliberately weighting the ratio to create an accounting result inconsistent with the risk management objective.
Inception documentation
IFRS 9.6.4.1(b) requires formal designation and documentation at the inception of the hedge, covering the risk management objective and strategy, the hedging instrument, the hedged item, the nature of the risk being hedged, and how the entity will assess whether the effectiveness requirements are met — including the calculation of the hedge ratio and the sources of expected ineffectiveness. This is a completeness threshold: documentation assembled after inception, or missing any of these elements, means the relationship never qualified, and the derivative is measured at fair value through profit or loss from day one.
Prospective effectiveness
IFRS 9 requires effectiveness to be assessed prospectively — at inception and at each reporting date, or on a significant change in circumstances — under IFRS 9.6.4.1(c) and B6.4.12. There is no retrospective quantitative test. For simple hedges where the critical terms of the instrument and hedged item match, a qualitative assessment can suffice per IFRS 9.B6.4.13-B6.4.17; where they do not match, a quantitative method (for example a regression or scenario analysis) is used to demonstrate the offset and to quantify the hedge ratio. Any measured ineffectiveness is still recognised immediately in profit or loss under IFRS 9.6.5.11(c) even though the pass/fail test is prospective.
Worked example: cash flow hedge of forecast USD purchases
This example works a cash flow hedge of a highly probable forecast foreign-currency purchase, showing the fair value movement through OCI and the basis adjustment on the hedged transaction under IFRS 9.6.5.11(d)(i). It is illustrative but the mechanics mirror how an importer or airline accounts for forward FX and fuel hedges.
Setup
- Hedged item: a highly probable forecast purchase of inventory for USD 5,000,000, expected in 6 months.
- Hedging instrument: a 6-month FX forward to buy USD 5,000,000 at 1.2500 GBP/USD (contracted cost GBP 4,000,000).
- Designation: cash flow hedge; critical terms of the forward match the forecast purchase, so a qualitative effectiveness assessment applies (IFRS 9.B6.4.13). Hedge ratio 1:1.
- Spot move: the pound weakens; at settlement the spot is 1.1900, so the same USD 5,000,000 would otherwise cost GBP 4,201,681.
Fair value movements and journals
The forward gains value as sterling weakens, because it locks the cheaper 1.2500 rate. Assume the forward's fair value at the reporting date before settlement is a GBP 150,000 asset, rising to GBP 201,681 by settlement. The effective portion is deferred in the cash flow hedge reserve (IFRS 9.6.5.11); with matched critical terms, ineffectiveness is nil here.
| Date | Forward fair value (GBP) | Period movement | To OCI (effective) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inception | 0 | — | — |
| Reporting date | 150,000 asset | +150,000 | 150,000 |
| Settlement | 201,681 asset | +51,681 | 51,681 |
At the reporting date, defer the effective gain in OCI:
Cr OCI — cash flow hedge reserve 150,000
At settlement, record the remaining movement to OCI and close out the forward for cash of GBP 201,681:
Cr OCI — cash flow hedge reserve 51,681
Dr Cash 201,681
Cr Derivative asset (forward) 201,681
Basis adjustment on the hedged transaction
Because the hedged item is a forecast purchase of a non-financial asset, IFRS 9.6.5.11(d)(i) requires the GBP 201,681 accumulated in the cash flow hedge reserve to be removed from equity and included directly in the initial cost of inventory (a basis adjustment, not a profit-or-loss reclassification). The inventory is bought at spot for GBP 4,201,681; the reserve reduces its carrying cost back to the GBP 4,000,000 the company economically locked in:
Cr Cash 4,201,681
Dr OCI — cash flow hedge reserve 201,681
Cr Inventory (basis adjustment) 201,681
Net inventory cost is GBP 4,000,000. Had the company instead not used hedge accounting, the forward's GBP 201,681 gain would have hit profit or loss over the two periods while inventory came in at full spot cost, distorting both periods' margins — the exact volatility the policy exists to remove (IFRS 9.6.1.1).
How do rebalancing and discontinuation work?
Rebalancing and discontinuation are IFRS 9's two responses when a hedge stops behaving as designated, and they are not interchangeable. Rebalancing (IFRS 9.6.5.5 and B6.5.7-B6.5.21) adjusts the hedge ratio of a continuing relationship when the risk management objective is unchanged but the ratio no longer reflects the economic relationship — for example a proven 0.95 offset drifts and the entity adds or reduces the quantity of hedging instrument. Rebalancing is a continuation, not a fresh start: cumulative amounts in the hedge reserve stay, and any ineffectiveness up to the rebalancing date is recognised in profit or loss first.
Discontinuation is mandatory, not elective, under IFRS 9.6.5.6-6.5.7 and B6.5.22-B6.5.28. A hedge is discontinued when the qualifying criteria in IFRS 9.6.4.1 are no longer met (and rebalancing cannot fix them), when the instrument expires, is sold, terminated or exercised, or when the risk management objective itself changes. Voluntary de-designation while the objective persists is prohibited — a deliberate contrast with IAS 39. On discontinuation of a cash flow hedge, the amount already in the cash flow hedge reserve stays there and is released when the forecast transaction affects profit or loss, unless that transaction is no longer expected to occur, in which case IFRS 9.6.5.12 requires immediate reclassification to profit or loss.
Auditor red flags
Hedge accounting concentrates audit risk in valuation and documentation, so the flags below each map to a specific ISA. These are the issues that most often move a hedge from "designated" to "de-designated" on the file.
- Fair values that cannot be corroborated (ISA 540). Derivative and hedged-item fair values are accounting estimates. Under ISA 540 (Revised) the auditor challenges the valuation model, the discount curve, credit and debit valuation adjustments, and the measurement of ineffectiveness. A red flag is management asserting nil ineffectiveness on a hedge whose critical terms do not match, with no quantitative support.
- Inception documentation assembled late or incomplete (ISA 500). ISA 500 requires sufficient appropriate audit evidence over the existence and completeness of designation. Documentation dated after the hedge began, silent on the hedge ratio, or missing the effectiveness method fails IFRS 9.6.4.1(b) — and the correct answer is fair value through profit or loss from inception, not a retrospective fix.
- Risk-management process and controls not understood (ISA 315). Under ISA 315 (Revised 2019) the auditor must understand the treasury process, the highly-probable assessment for forecast transactions, and the controls over designation and rebalancing. A red flag is a forecast transaction designated as "highly probable" that the entity's own forecasts no longer support, threatening reserve recycling under IFRS 9.6.5.12.
Case study: easyJet fuel and FX cash flow hedges
The company. easyJet plc is a natural user of IFRS 9 cash flow hedge accounting: it buys jet fuel priced in US dollars and earns a large share of revenue in euros, so both commodity price and FX variability threaten future cash flows. Its Board-approved policy hedges up to roughly 18 months of forecast fuel and currency exposures using forwards and swaps, designated as cash flow hedges of highly probable forecast transactions (IFRS 9.6.5.11).
Publicly filed figures (year ended 30 September 2023). easyJet's FY2023 results disclosed a net asset position on derivative financial instruments of GBP 153 million, down from GBP 442 million a year earlier — a decrease of GBP 289 million. The company attributed the fall largely to currency derivatives losing asset value as sterling strengthened against the US dollar and euro versus the prior year-end, partly offset by a gain on jet-fuel hedges as the forward fuel curve rose. Reported fuel costs were GBP 2,033 million (2022: GBP 1,279 million).
Why hedge accounting matters here. The effective portion of those forward movements sits in easyJet's cash flow hedge reserve within OCI, not in profit or loss, until the hedged fuel is burned or the currency cash flows arise. Without designation, a GBP 289 million swing in derivative fair values would have flowed straight through earnings, overwhelming operating results. The disclosures illustrate the policy's purpose: deferral in OCI, recycling as the hedged transactions occur, and transparency over the reserve movement.
Figures are taken from easyJet plc's publicly filed FY2023 results announcement (year ended 30 September 2023). The commentary is our own analysis; any period-to-period bridge is illustrative and does not reproduce easyJet's full note disclosures. Not investment advice.
Frequently asked questions
Is hedge accounting mandatory under IFRS 9?
No. It is an accounting policy choice (IFRS 9.6.1.1). If a hedge is not designated, the derivative is still measured at fair value through profit or loss; designation only changes the timing and location of the gains and losses so they match the hedged item.
Did IFRS 9 remove the 80-125% effectiveness test?
Yes. IFRS 9.6.4.1(c) replaced the IAS 39 retrospective 80-125% bright line with three prospective conditions: an economic relationship exists, credit risk does not dominate the value changes, and the hedge ratio reflects the quantities actually hedged.
Where does the effective portion of a cash flow hedge go?
To OCI. Under IFRS 9.6.5.11 the effective portion accumulates in the cash flow hedge reserve, then is reclassified to profit or loss — or basis-adjusted into a non-financial asset's cost under IFRS 9.6.5.11(d)(i) — when the hedged item affects profit or loss.
What is hedge rebalancing?
Rebalancing (IFRS 9.6.5.5) adjusts the hedge ratio of an existing relationship when the risk management objective is unchanged but the ratio no longer reflects the economic relationship. It continues the hedge rather than discontinuing it, and any ineffectiveness to date is recognised first.
When must a company discontinue hedge accounting?
Discontinuation is required (IFRS 9.6.5.6-6.5.7) when the qualifying criteria are no longer met and cannot be fixed by rebalancing, the instrument expires or is sold, or the risk management objective changes. Voluntary de-designation is not allowed while the objective persists.
What happens to the cash flow hedge reserve if the forecast transaction will not occur?
Under IFRS 9.6.5.12 the accumulated amount in the reserve is reclassified from OCI to profit or loss immediately once the forecast transaction is no longer expected to occur.
Can you hedge a non-financial item like jet fuel?
Yes. IFRS 9.6.3.1 and 6.3.7 allow a non-financial item to be a hedged item, in whole or for a separately identifiable and reliably measurable risk component — which is why airlines and manufacturers apply cash flow hedge accounting to forecast commodity purchases.
→ IFRS 9 Financial Instruments Hub
• IFRS 9 Expected Credit Loss (ECL) Model: Three-Stage Impairment with Worked Examples
• IFRS 9 Classification & Measurement: Business Model Test & SPPI Explained
• IFRS 9 Impairment Accounting: Lifetime ECL vs 12-Month ECL & Stage Movements
• IFRS 9 Modification & Derecognition: Loan Changes, Forgiveness & Exit Accounting